Until 2019, California family courts treated pets the way they treated coffee tables: as community property to be divided based on who paid for them and who held title. Anyone who has ever shared their life with a dog or cat knew that approach was inadequate, and the legislature eventually agreed.
Family Code §2605, effective January 1, 2019 and refined since, gives courts explicit authority to order joint or sole care of pets and to consider the animal’s well-being. Five years in, Los Angeles judges have developed predictable expectations for what good “pet custody” cases look like. Here is what the statute actually says, what evidence persuades courts, and what mistakes derail pet custody requests.

What Family Code §2605 Actually Says
The statute provides that, on a party’s request, the court may assign sole or joint ownership of a pet animal taking into consideration the care of the pet animal. “Care” is defined to include prevention of cruelty and the provision of food, water, veterinary treatment, safe and protected shelter, and protection from harm. The court may order one party to care for the pet during pendency of the proceeding.
The provision applies to “pet animals,” which the statute defines as community property animals kept as a household pet. It does not cover service animals (which generally remain with the disabled spouse), livestock, or animals kept for commercial purposes.
What Counts as Evidence of Care
Judges weigh practical, day-to-day caregiving more than ownership documents. Strong evidence includes:
- Veterinary records showing which spouse takes the pet to appointments
- Records of pet insurance, food purchases, and grooming
- Photos and videos showing the spouse’s involvement in feeding, exercise, and care
- Statements from the pet’s veterinarian, trainer, or boarding facility
- Evidence of who physically transports and walks the pet
- Microchip registration in one spouse’s name
- Adoption records if the pet was adopted from a shelter or rescue
Evidence That Carries Less Weight
- Receipts showing who originally paid for the pet
- “Surprise gift” arguments without corroboration
- Title to the pet alone, without evidence of actual care
- Sentimental claims unsupported by caregiving records
Joint Pet Custody Arrangements
Many California couples successfully share their pets after divorce. Common arrangements include:
- Schedule mirroring the children’s parenting plan, so the pet stays with whichever parent has the kids
- Alternating weeks or biweekly schedules with one home as the primary residence
- Vacation and travel coverage, with the non-traveling spouse caring for the pet
- Financial sharing of veterinary bills, food, and major expenses
- Decision-making provisions for major medical care, end-of-life decisions, and training
Sole Pet Custody Cases
Courts will award sole pet custody when joint arrangements would harm the animal. Factors include:
- Geographic distance between households
- A spouse’s living situation that does not allow pets
- Allergies in one household
- A history of mistreatment by one spouse
- The pet’s temperament and how it handles transitions
- Special medical needs requiring consistency
Pets and Domestic Violence Cases
Family Code §6320 explicitly authorizes protective orders to extend to pets. A petitioner can seek an order awarding exclusive custody of a pet and prohibiting the restrained party from contacting, harming, or otherwise disturbing the animal. This protection has become more meaningful since research established that abuse of pets is a documented predictor of escalation toward family members.
Multiple Pets in One Household
When a household has multiple pets, courts often try to keep bonded animals together rather than splitting them between households. A pair of dogs raised together, or a cat and dog with a strong bond, generally remain a unit unless evidence supports separation.
Practical Steps During Separation
- Update the microchip registration to reflect the spouse who will primarily care for the pet
- Maintain consistent veterinary care under the spouse who will likely keep the pet
- Document daily care—photos, schedules, walking logs—from the date of separation
- If joint custody is the goal, agree to a temporary schedule and follow it consistently
- Avoid using the pet as leverage in other parts of the divorce
Frequently Asked Questions
Q: Are pets really treated like children in California now?
A: No. Pets are still legally property, but Family Code §2605 lets courts consider the pet’s welfare in ways property law alone does not.
Q: Can I get pet support like child support?
A: Not formally, but settlement agreements often include cost-sharing provisions for veterinary bills, food, and major expenses.
Q: What if the pet was acquired before the marriage?
A: A pre-marital pet is generally separate property of the spouse who acquired it, though the court still has authority to consider care during the marriage.
Suggested internal links:
- Link to: Parenting Plans in California: Building a Schedule That Works
- Link to: Domestic Violence Restraining Orders in Los Angeles Family Court
- Link to: Areas of Practice → Dissolution
🐾 Your pet is family. Make sure your divorce reflects that. Call Hermes Law Group at (213) 368-0000.
